(continued Don't Tie Camden's Economic Recovery to Pentagon Contractors)
But I want good jobs with peace at union scale wages for those at or near the bottom of the South Jersey economic heap. I really do want to create a middle class, first from among the oppressed sectors of people in Camden Cityand its environs.
According to camdennewjersey.org Camden’s poverty rate is 32.8% The unemployment rate is three times the New Jersey and national average. Per capita income in the city is under $10,000, Over 45% of Camden residents receive some form of public assistance.
I also want an end to wars of aggression as in Iraq and I want deep cuts in Pentagon spending. This may sound strange coming from a Vietnam era U.S. Air Force veteran, but for me the best way to support our valiant troops in Iraqis to stop the war, bring them home now and move them out of harm's way. Once back home maybe they could be re-trained to work in unionized industries that provide for our people's many and varied domestic needs. Re-training or quality education of oppressed sectors could be financed by the cuts made in the Pentagon death budget.
I am for the ways of peace and thus opposed to increased Pentagon spending for advanced weapons and equipment. I see Pentagon related defense contractor profit taking as problematic no matter how it’s packaged --- in this case as a major tool of salvation in Camden's economic recovery. Many area leaders in business and the public sector are pleased that Camden is becoming "a player in a surprising industry: defense" says a bold headline in a January 19th Newsday.com article.
From the prison-industrial complex of a few years back, to the growing military-university-technological complex of today. Is this Camden's economic fate? Does it have to be or are there real economic alternatives?
Actually, the presence in Camden City of defense contractors has done almost nothing to help drive down the city's poverty, joblessness and other economic ills. That defense contractor pay rolls have added 700 jobs in six years is not saying much especially since the 700 jobs require a highly technical work force. Moreover, most of the technically skilled workers hired at these establishments do not live or spend much of their earnings in Camden. No CamdenCity middle class is being created by their presence.
Even in the face of an emergent defense contracting industry, Camden’s vital economic statistics remain utterly grim. According to camdennewjersey.org Camden’s poverty rate is 32.8% The unemployment rate is three times the New Jersey and national average. Per capita income in the city is under $10,000,
Over 45% of Camden residents receive some form of public assistance. Yet, military equipment publications like Jane's International Defence Review, estimate the cost of only one Navy Virginia-class nuclear submarine is $2.6 billion or over 5 times what it costs to run Camden City's budget and its schools. The cost of one of the US Navy’s three new CVN-21 aircraft carriers is $12 billion and one new DD (X) destroyer is $3.4 billion or a total of $15 billion plus. The U.S. Air Force Missile Defense system’s cost is $10.4 billion. Tests of this system keeps failing --- and on and on … while Camden and inner-cities across America fail.
I think Camden's economic recovery ought to be based on life-enhancing, green type industries like those being proposed in the Apollo Alliance. The Alliance is a national labor union, environmentalist, business, church and peace group sponsored coalition that aims to build new industries, offer new job opportunities to poor communities, help in the recovery of old rust-belt industrial towns and do it all with a clean environment in mind.
Camden and this whole shore line of the Delaware River from the Betsy Ross down to the Commodore Barry needs an area-wide economic initiative that relies on technologies that produce for peaceful purposes, rather than production for war and death. Called such an initiative the Delaware River East Green Line Project or whatever. It would be a wonderful and productive way to turn area economic fortunes around. Maybe we can get the Apollo Alliance people an office or floor at the Waterfront Technological Center.
Because of Camden's need for an economic about-face, I like the Apollo Alliance sponsored ideas that the City of Oakland, California and three other East Bay cities laid out in their recently announced formation of the East BayGreen Corridor Partnership, together with leaders of the University of California at Berkeley and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The partnership’s ambitious goals: to build “the heart of the East Bay into a dynamic Green Corridor” and “to lead the world in environmental innovation, emerging green business and industry, green jobs, and renewable energy.”
As you may know Oakland is a city with a multitude of urban ills not unlike the problems facing Camden. Poverty, high unemployment, on-going local depression like economic statistics and the "racial wealth divide" are operative out there as well as back here. The other East bay cities that form the Green Corridor Partnership are Berkeley, Richmond and Emeryville. These towns may be likened to the inner-suburbs of Pennsauken, Riverton and Gloucester City.
Towns located near the Delaware River with their own unique economic needs. Congressman Rob Andrews, my opponent in the 1st District, wonders if his constituency, including residents of Camden City "can get a quality education" in order to qualify for good paying defense contractor jobs. Andrews who, according to a the same Newsday.com article "became a proponent of trying to get private businesses to create military uses out of commercial technology" obviously is not concerned about using university research and industry advances in technology for peaceful purposes. Nor does he seem to mind that upstart high tech military contractors seem to have little or no loyalty to staying in Camden once they get on their feet.
In his quest to grow big profits, Brad Blumberg, CEO of a defense contracting firm called Smarter Agent, apparently could care less about Camden's recovery fortunes. Rep. Andrews, instead of praising this escapist and disloyal to Camden CEO, should engage Blumberg's start up company in at least a dialogue about showing the proper corporate etiquette toward the public that assists his company with cozy "corporate welfare" breaks. After all Blumberg's start up firm enjoys the incomparable benefits of being housed in a brand new public facility funded by the citizens of Camden and New Jersey at the Waterfront Technology Center, a project of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority.
What if the universities --- one of which is Rutgers-Camden where I teach African American philosophy and religion courses --- that are now locating in Camden City could become like U. Cal. at Berkeley and use their academic and research capacities to help my proposed Green Line Project to get off the ground. Since the new national energy bill passed last December, and supported by Rep. Andrews, only allocates a miserly $125 million for work force training for new green jobs, I would call for at least a $1 billion in funds to educate inner-city and inner-suburban students and workers to take jobs in the new green industries.
I am certain that our leaders are aware that quality vocational and academic education to uplift economically oppressed sectors requires a corresponding quality level of investment of public funds. Increased levels of funding for inner-city or urban education, with the goal of producing good paying jobs for peaceful purposes, would be a sound corrective to those who continue to vaguely “wonder if people in Camden can get a quality education”.
An alliance of business leaders, unions, environmental, religious and peace-justice groups, now that's the green American way to 21st century economic prosperity. That's the real ticket to Camden's recovery and the development of older river communities up and down our part of the eastern shore of the DelawareRiver.
Dr. Mahdi Ibn-Ziyad, January 21, 2007